【禹菲 姜廣輝】《論語一包養網站比較》馬融注與鄭玄注比較

(He Yan: “Collected Explanations of the Commentary”, published by the World Book Bureau in 2011)

Content summary:In history, Ma Rong and Zheng Xuan each had a complete Commentary. Later, He Yan’s “Collected Explanations of the Songs” collected the notes of the Eight Masters, among which he selected the notes of Ma Rong and Zheng Xuan. Because the basics selected for each article are a family note, the notes selected for Ma Rong and Zheng Xuan are not compared for a long time because the article does not include intersections.

In recent years, the “Tang Dynasty Commentary and Research” was published, which provides the conditions for comparative discussion. We may imagine that when He Yan made the “Collected Explanations of the Speech”, he had to study eight annotated books at the same time for every article of the “Collected Explanations” and choose the best and eliminate the inferior.

As for the comparison department, He Yan’s choice is trustworthy. Under most circumstances, He Yan took Ma Rong but not Zheng Xuan because Ma Rong was better. Of course, He Yan must have taken Zheng Xuan’s note and abandoned Ma Rong’s note. There should be many such situations, but tomorrow you will no longer see the abandoned Ma Rongzhu Department.

So, it is impossible to think that Ma Rongzhu is better than Zheng Xuanzhu in this way. We can only say that in terms of the information we have seen today, Ma Rong’s note is better than Zheng Xuan’s note, so it became the reason for He Yan’s decision.

Keywords: SpeechBaoqing websiteNote; Ma Rong; Zheng Xuan; He Yan

1. Introduction

Ma Rong (79-166), whose courtesy name is Jichang. People from Fufeng Maoling (now northeast of Xingping, Xixi). During the Donghan period, there were famous ancient Chinese scholars who taught disciples, and there were often as many as a thousand people. Zheng Xuan once learned from him.

Ma Rong has many annotated books throughout his life, and has been praised by books such as “Speech”, “Filial Piety”, “Praise”, “Book of Changes”, “Three Gifts”, and “Shangshu”. The “Annotations” quoted in this article is adopted by He Yan’s “Annotations of the Annotations”.

(Ma Rong)

Zheng Xuan (127-200), whose courtesy name was Kangcheng, was from Gaomi, Beihai (now Bianfang City, Shandong Province), and was a major student in the late Dong and Han Dynasty. He has been a member of the Han Dynasty’s academic master throughout his life.

Zheng Xuan also wrote a “Speech Note”. Zheng Xuan was called “Sheng Shen” in Chinese history and has a noble academic position. So that the Han Tang scholars worshipped them as gods. In the Tang Dynasty, Yuan Xingyu once said that at that time, the scholars learned Zheng Xuan scientifically, “The Emperor of Ning Dao and Confucius mistakenly, and he was convinced by the emperor.” (“Old Tang Books·Yuanxing Introduction”)

In history, Ma Rong and Zheng Xuan each had a complete “Online Notes”. Later, He Yan’s “Collected Explanations of the Songs” collected the notes of the Eight Masters, among which he selected the notes of Ma Rong and Zheng Xuan. Because the basis selected for each article is a one-on-one note. Therefore, the notes of Ma Rong and Zheng Xuan were selected because the articles do not include intersections, so there is no comparison.

After He Yan’s “Collected Interpretations of the Book of Songs”, the eight annotations included Ma Rong and Zheng Xuan’s annotations were lost one after another. We have no conditions to compare between Ma Rong and Zheng Xuan’s notes.

However, in the early last century, several copies of Zheng Xuan’s “Online Notes” were discovered from Dunhuang and Tulufan’s books. This copy was compiled into a book called “Zheng’s Notes on Tang Dynasty and its Research” (the article is briefly called “Zheng Xuan’s “Online Notes on Song Dynasty”) and was published in the Cultural Relics Book Club in 1991.

A writer studied his book and found that there are dozens of articles in Zheng Xuan’s “Online Notes” and Ma Rong’s “Online Notes” cited by He Yan, so there are conditions that can be compared and discussed.

We may imagine that when He Yan made the “Collected Explanations of the Speech”, he had to study eight annotated books at the same time for each article of the Speech, and choose the best to eliminate inferiority. As for the choice of Ma Rong’s noteto nourish the relationship, He Yan certainly believes that Ma Rong’s note is better than the other seven notes (including Zheng Xuan note). Even if Zheng Xuan’s notes and Ma Rong’s meaning are nearby, because Ma Rong’s era was first, Ma Rong would choose to abandon Zheng Xuan.

What we can compare here is one of the doors that He Yan took and abandoned that year. To put it bluntly, as far as this article is concerned, when He Yan chose Ma Rongzhu, it means that in He Yan’s eyes, Ma Rongzhu was first and better than Zheng Xuanzhu, so he took Ma Rong and abandoned Zheng Xuan. Fortunately, we will see the Zheng Xuanzhu Division tomorrow that He Yan has never chosen.

So, can He Yan’s gaze be correct? The author makes his own judgment through two comparisons.

The author believes that in terms of the department, He Yan’s choice is trustworthy. Under most circumstances, He Yan took Ma Rong but not Zheng Xuan because Ma Rong was better. Of course, He Yan must have taken Zheng Xuan’s note and abandoned Ma Rong’s note. There should be many such situations, but we will no longer see the abandoned Ma Rongzhu Department tomorrow.

(Zheng Xuan)

Therefore, we cannot think that Ma Rongzhu is better than Zheng Xuanzhu in this way. We can only say that as far as we see these data, after Ma Rong’s play was broadcast, Wan Yurou was unexpectedly red, and as a slap betting was better than Zheng Xuan betting, so it became the reason why He Yan took it. The above are divided into five categories of situations and explained through specific examples. For the sake of simplicity, the title is appropriate and simple.

2. Six cases of Marx and Zheng’s meanings differ and are clearly superior to those of the country

1. “The Second of the Contemporary Chinese: “The Master said: The Yin Dynasty was benefited by the Xia Dynasty, and it was known that the Zhou Dynasty was benefited by the Yin Dynasty.”

>Ma Note: “The cause is the three realms and five constants. What is the benefit is the three distinctions of literary and cultural principles.”

Zheng’s note: “What is the benefit can be understood is the number of teaching (school) that can be taught.”

Analysis: Ma Rong distinguished the causes and benefits, and the reason was the “three realms and five constants”, but there may be a problem with whether the “three realms and five constants” in the Xia and Shang dynasties. “The benefits” refers to the “three cultural traditions”. The “three cultural traditions” appeared later. In “Traditional Notes”, Xia Shangquan Shangshen, Yin Shangshen Ghosts and Gods, Zhou Shangshen Gong Gu, and the three cultural traditions are a later statement.

Zheng Xuan did not explain the cause, but only explained the benefits. He did not talk about the “Three Kingdoms and Five Constant Permanences” or the “Three Constitutions of Text”, but he did not understand very clearly. “Times” seems to believe that Xia Rong and Yin dynasties each had a book with its title. What are effective and what are useless will benefit from the needs of that time.

This statement will also arouse doubts among students. Is there any writing